Mixed Reception for Monteith's Baltic Porter
Geoff Griggs is not exactly gushing over Monteith’s Baltic Porter, in his monthly Capital Times column:
Sadly I also found the Monteith’s beer lacked the tarry texture, coffeeish bitterness and "burnt currant" notes and overall intensity that I was hoping for.
He does, however, insist that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so you should judge for yourself.
I found the Baltic a little lightweight and having the Monteith’s “house character” but it’s certainly more drinkable than the Tripel (Monteith’s other recent special release). Meanwhile, a third placing at Neil Miller’s September Cellar-Vate tasting, much to one RealBeer writer’s chagrin, proved the Baltic Porter to be a reasonably popular winter warmer with the educated masses.
Sadly I also found the Monteith’s beer lacked the tarry texture, coffeeish bitterness and "burnt currant" notes and overall intensity that I was hoping for.
He does, however, insist that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so you should judge for yourself.
I found the Baltic a little lightweight and having the Monteith’s “house character” but it’s certainly more drinkable than the Tripel (Monteith’s other recent special release). Meanwhile, a third placing at Neil Miller’s September Cellar-Vate tasting, much to one RealBeer writer’s chagrin, proved the Baltic Porter to be a reasonably popular winter warmer with the educated masses.
posted by Stu as "Stu" at 5:18 pm
1 Comments:
Chagrin is right Stu. I had another last night, in the interests of giving it a fair go, and all I can taste is banana and sugar. Knowing Monteiths, if they made a hefeweizen, it would be the only beer that didn't have any banana esters present. Blech. The only good thing I have to say about it is that it's the best of their range for me so far. That's probably not much of a complement though.
Am I being too tough?
Post a Comment
<< Home